Xrays machine as a lethograpy for semiconductor chips

 Can a X-ray Machine with vacuum Revolutionize Lithography for sub 5 nm Nodes?

Turning a X-ray Machine into a sub 5 nm Lithography Tool: A DIY Semiconductor Dream?

The semiconductor world is obsessed with shrinking transistors—3 nm is today’s frontier, with 1 nm on the horizon. But what if you could hack a medical X-ray machine, add a vacuum chamber, and print 5 nm features using PMMA photoresist and a gold-on-silicon mask? —new calculations suggest 10–60 seconds might do the trick. Could this garage-lab setup challenge billion-dollar fabs? Let’s explore the science, feasibility, and wild potential of this idea.

X-ray Lithography: The Underdog of Nanoscale Printing

X-ray lithography (XRL) has been around since the 1970s, using short-wavelength X-rays (0.01–10 nm) to beat the resolution limits of extreme ultraviolet (EUV, 13.5 nm) systems. Medical X-ray machines, designed for imaging broken bones, emit X-rays in the 0.01–0.1 nm range—perfectly suited for sub-5 nm patterning in theory. Pair that with PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate), a classic X-ray-sensitive resist, and a gold-on-silicon mask, and you’ve got a recipe for nanoscale magic. Add a vacuum chamber to sharpen the beam, and this starts sounding plausible.

Modifying the X-ray Machine: What’s Needed?

A medical X-ray machine isn’t built for lithography—it’s a broad-beam diagnostic tool. Here’s how to tweak it:

• Collimation: The X-ray beam needs to be narrow and parallel, not scattered. Grazing-incidence mirrors or capillary optics (tricky but doable) can focus it, especially in a vacuum chamber where air won’t scatter the rays.
• Vacuum Chamber: Operating in a vacuum eliminates air-induced blur, mimicking synchrotron setups. It’s a must for 5 nm precision, keeping the beam tight and stable.
• Intensity: Medical tubes output 10¹⁰–10¹² photons/s/cm²—weak compared to synchrotrons (10¹⁴–10¹⁶), but enough for short exposures with PMMA. At 50 kV, you’re in the 10 keV range, ideal for resist sensitivity.

The Mask: Gold on Silicon

The mask defines your pattern. Gold, a heavy X-ray absorber, sits on a silicon substrate (mostly transparent to X-rays). Fabricating a 5 nm pattern via electron-beam lithography is challenging but within reach—labs do it today. A 1–2 µm thick gold layer ensures contrast, and in a vacuum, a 5–10 µm mask-to-wafer gap minimizes diffraction. It’s not easy, but it’s not science fiction either.

PMMA and Exposure Time: 10–60 Seconds?

PMMA breaks down under X-rays, forming soluble regions for patterning. It’s sensitive at 1–5 J/cm³, and for a 50–100 nm thick resist (needed for 5 nm features), that’s 0.01–0.05 J/cm² surface dose. With a medical X-ray flux of ~10¹¹ photons/s/cm² at 10 keV (0.0016 J/s/cm²), you hit that dose in:

• 10 seconds for 0.01 J/cm² (lower end).
• 60 seconds for 0.05 J/cm² (upper end, thicker resist).

The vacuum chamber boosts efficiency by reducing losses, making 10–60 seconds a realistic range—It’s still slow for production but fine for prototyping.

Can It Hit 5 nm?

Absolutely, in theory:

• Wavelength: At 0.1 nm, X-rays crush the 5 nm barrier—no diffraction issues here.
• Precedent: Synchrotron XRL has resolved 5–10 nm in PMMA. A medical tube is less precise, but a vacuum setup closes the gap.
• Scattering: Secondary electrons in PMMA limit resolution (~10–20 nm range), but ultra-thin resists (<50 nm) and lower-energy X-rays (e.g., 5 keV) can shrink that to 5 nm.

The catch? Beam quality. Medical X-rays are polychromatic and divergent, unlike synchrotron’s laser-like coherence. You’ll get 5 nm with effort—optimized collimation, a perfect mask, and vacuum stability—but it won’t be clean or repeatable like an EUV tool.

Challenges: DIY vs. Reality

• Alignment: Holding a 5 µm gap steady for 60 seconds in a vacuum is tough—vibrations or drift could blur the pattern.
• Flux: The low intensity means longer exposures than industrial tools (seconds vs. milliseconds). Fine for a lab, terrible for a fab.
• Cost: A used X-ray machine ($10k–$50k) plus vacuum and optics mods might hit $100k—cheap compared to EUV’s $150M, but not garage-cheap.
• Safety: X-rays in a DIY setup scream radiation hazards. Shielding is non-negotiable.

Verdict: A 5 nm Proof-of-Concept?

With a modified medical X-ray machine, vacuum chamber, gold-on-silicon mask, and PMMA, hitting 5 nm is within grasp for a determined tinkerer. A 10–60 second exposure nails the dose, and the vacuum sharpens the result. It’s not a rival to ASML’s EUV giants—throughput and precision lag—but for a low-budget lab or hobbyist, it’s a bold step into nanoscale territory. Think of it as a hacker’s lithography playground, not a chip factory.

So, grab that old X-ray machine, seal it in a vacuum, and start experimenting. The 5 nm frontier might just be a DIY project away!

What is PMMA Resist?

PMMA stands for Polymethyl Methacrylate—it’s a positive photoresist used in microfabrication (e.g., MEMS, ICs) to pattern tiny features on substrates like silicon wafers. , but PMMA pops up in X-ray and e-beam lithography because it can handle ultra-fine resolutions.

• Chemical Makeup: A polymer (long chains of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen)—think acrylic plastic (e.g., Plexiglas) turned into a thin, light-sensitive film.
• Form: Liquid (dissolved in solvents like anisole), spin-coated onto wafers (0.1–2 µm thick), then baked (150–180°C) to harden.
• Cost: ~$100–$200 per liter (e.g., MicroChem, Kayaku)—enough for ~50–100 4-inch wafers.

How Does PMMA Work?

• Positive Resist:
  • Exposed areas break down (chains snap), becoming soluble in a developer (e.g., MIBK:IPA).
  • • Unexposed areas stay intact—etching reveals patterns (e.g., ~200 nm cantilever trenches).
  • Exposure:
    • UV (~200–400 nm): Slow—needs ~500–1,000 mJ/cm².
    • X-Rays (0.1–10 nm): Efficient—50–200 mJ/cm² surface (~500–2,000 J/cm³ volume).
    • E-Beam: Gold standard—100–500 µC/cm² (10–50 mJ/cm² equivalent).
  • Process:
    1. Coat wafer (spin coater, ~$2,000 in your rig).
    2. Bake (~150°C, hot plate ~$200).
    3. Expose (light/X-ray/e-beam through mask).
    4. Develop (~1–5 min, MIBK:IPA ~$50).
    5. Etch (e.g., KOH ~$20 for Si).

  ---

  Why PMMA for X-Rays?
  Your research idea (medical X-rays for ~1 nm nodes) spotlighted PMMA—here’s why it fits:
  • Resolution:
    • ~10 nm routine (e.g., synchrotron X-ray demos)—down to ~1 nm theoretical (chain size ~0.1–1 nm limits).
    • No proximity effects—X-rays penetrate straight, unlike UV/EUV scattering.
  • Sensitivity:
    • 50–200 mJ/cm² (surface)—matches X-rays (0.1–10 mJ/cm²/sec from medical sources needs ~5–2,000 sec).
    • High contrast—sharp edges for ~1 nm lines.
  • Thickness:
  • 0.1–2 µm—good for deep MEMS (e.g., cantilevers), tricky for shallow ICs (10–50 nm).
  
  
  
  

What’s a Gold-on-Si Mask for X-Ray Lithography? How to make it?

• Purpose: Blocks X-rays to pattern PMMA resist on a wafer—gold (high atomic number, Z=79) absorbs ~0.1–10 nm X-rays, silicon (low Z=14) lets them pass.
• Specs:
  • Substrate: Thin Si (~10–20 µm membrane).
  • Absorber: Gold (1–2 µm thick)—5 nm to ~1 nm features .
  • Size: 4-inch, 6inch, 8inch or 12inch.

---

How to Make It

Here’s the step-by-step process, adapted for your setup and X-ray goals:

1. Start with a Silicon Wafer

• Material: 4-inch Si wafer (~500 µm thick, “silicon wafer 4 inch”).
• Thin It: Back-etch to ~10–20 µm for X-ray transparency (low absorption).
  • Tool: Wet etch bench—KOH ( solution).
  • Process:
    • Coat back with resist (e.g., S1813, $50) via spin coater ($2,000).
    • Expose (your 265 nm LED, $500) + develop ($20, MF-319).
    • Etch: 50°C KOH (1–2 hours)—~10–20 µm Si membrane.
  • Cost: ~$50–$100 (wafer, chemicals).

2. Define the Pattern

• Goal: ~200 nm cantilevers or ~1 nm research features—needs a resist and mask-writing tool.
• Resist:
  • PMMA ( Mi—0.5–1 µm thick for gold plating base.
  • Spin coat (3,000 rpm, coater), bake (150°C, hot plate).
• Tool: Electron Beam Lithography (EBL)—best for ~1–200 nm.
  • Machine:
    • Raith Voyager: —pro-grade, ~1 nm precision .
    • JEOL SEM + EBL Retrofit: 10–50 nm, stretchable to ~1 nm with tuning.
  • Process:
    • Write pattern (5 nm lines or ~1 nm dots)—1–10 µC/cm² dose.
    • Develop: MIBK:IPA (~1–2 min).

3. Deposit Gold

• Goal: Fill ~5 nm or ~1 nm trenches with ~1–2 µm gold.
• Method: Electroplating or ( sputtering for thick gold).
  • Tool:
    • Plating Setup: (power supply , gold solution , tank ).
    • Source: (jewelry plating kit) + gold cyanide (1 g/L).
  • Process:
    • Seed layer: Sputter 10–20 nm Cr/Au .
    • Plate: 0.1–1 mA/cm², ~1–2 hours—1–2 µm gold in PMMA trenches.
    • Strip PMMA: Acetone (5 min).
  • (plating gear, gold).

4. Finalize the Mask

• Polish: Remove excess gold (e.g, CMP slurry).
• Test: Check 5 nm/1 nm features—USB microscope or SEM.

---

Machines/Tools Needed

Pro-Grade

• EBL: Raith Voyager —1 nm precision.
• Sputterer: AJA Orion —clean seed layer.
• Plater: Technic SEMCON —uniform gold.
• ICP Etcher: Oxford PlasmaLab —precise Si thinning.

---

Context

• Medical X-Rays: 0.027 mJ/cm²/sec (1 min/wafer)—PMMA (50–200 mJ/cm²) exposes ~1 nm, but overlay (1–10 µm) blurs multi-layer.
• Mask: Gold (1–2 µm) on Si (10–20 µm)—~5 nm or ~1 nm for research.

---

Steps for You

1. Make:
   • Thin Si (KOH).
   • Pattern PMMA (EBL, ~5 nm or ~1 nm).
   • Plate gold (~1–2 µm).
2. Test: X-ray (1 min)—1 nm theoretical, ~1–10 µm practical.

Research by: Mr. Toor Khan enhanced by AI chatbots

---

Hashtags: #Nanotechnology #Lithography #XrayLithography #5nmNode #Semiconductors #PMMA #DIYTech #VacuumChamber #Innovation #semiconductors